From Andrew O'Hagan's review of Concerning E. M. Forster ...
*****
"Carpenter", writes Kermode,
pretty exactly fits Forster’s idea of one kind of creative person. He or she must be making something; it needn’t be something of great value or beauty—his writing in both prose and verse was poor, but the point is that the work has involved the person concerned in a disinterested exercise of creative power, an achievement that has nothing to do with success.
For Forster, art was a state as much as a pursuit, a place where someone
is taken out of himself. He lets down as it were a bucket into his subconscious, and draws up something which is normally beyond his reach. He mixes this thing with his normal experiences, and out of the mixture he makes a work of art. [It] is a blend of realism and “magic.”
*****
... one kind of creative person. He or she must be making something; it needn’t be something of great value or beauty ... the point is that the work has involved the person concerned in a disinterested exercise of creative power, an achievement that has nothing to do with success ...
That's us, isn't it?
Frank Kermode on E. M. Forster and the creative person
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7963
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 4:53 pm
- antispam: no
- Location: this hill-shadowed city/of razors and knives.
- Contact:
But don't you think that (latter) description fits anyone who gets really involved in an activity, so that they concentrate and forget themselves? I'm not sure that necessarily has to be creative, just fulfilling and absorbing. I think creative might be something a bit more, and perhaps has to feel successful, at least to the person concerned even if not to anyone else.
Ros
Ros
Rosencrantz: What are you playing at? Guildenstern: Words. Words. They're all we have to go on.
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
___________________________
Antiphon - www.antiphon.org.uk
I'll go along with that.David wrote: ... one kind of creative person. He or she must be making something; it needn’t be something of great value or beauty ... the point is that the work has involved the person concerned in a disinterested exercise of creative power, an achievement that has nothing to do with success ...
That's us, isn't it?
fine words butter no parsnips
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 6:45 pm
- antispam: no
- Location: Norfolk 'n' Good
It's the doing of it, I think, that is important. The completion, even if successful (whatever that means) is somehow a disappointment. The interest (for me) is in the chase: the searching for something, the waiting for something, the arrival of something, the shaping of something, the honing of something. Once it's finished, I lose interest and start the whole process again. In a sense success and failure are irrelevant.
'...one has only learnt to get the better of words
For the thing one no longer has to say, or the way in which
One is no longer disposed to say it.'
'...one has only learnt to get the better of words
For the thing one no longer has to say, or the way in which
One is no longer disposed to say it.'
"And I meet full face on dark mornings
The bestial visor, bent in
By the blows of what happened to happen."
Larkin
The bestial visor, bent in
By the blows of what happened to happen."
Larkin
-
- Perspicacious Poster
- Posts: 5375
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:35 am
- antispam: no
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
I'd go along with that Cam, which is why I have such a backlog of "unfinished" poems.cameron wrote:It's the doing of it, I think, that is important. The completion, even if successful (whatever that means) is somehow a disappointment. The interest (for me) is in the chase: the searching for something, the waiting for something, the arrival of something, the shaping of something, the honing of something. Once it's finished, I lose interest and start the whole process again. In a sense success and failure are irrelevant.
'...one has only learnt to get the better of words
For the thing one no longer has to say, or the way in which
One is no longer disposed to say it.'
The Eliot quote is apt, as is Valery's idea that "a poem is never finished, only abandoned" - abandoned as the author resumes the hunt.
B.
Well said, Cameron.cameron wrote:It's the doing of it, I think, that is important. The completion, even if successful (whatever that means) is somehow a disappointment. The interest (for me) is in the chase: the searching for something, the waiting for something, the arrival of something, the shaping of something, the honing of something. Once it's finished, I lose interest and start the whole process again. In a sense success and failure are irrelevant.
Best regards,
Lake
Aim, then, to be aimless.
Seek neither publication, nor acclaim:
Submit without submitting.
一 Cameron
Seek neither publication, nor acclaim:
Submit without submitting.
一 Cameron